# What is DFIT or MINI-FRAC?

## What Is the Objective of a DFIT/MINI-FRAC?

Home / MINI-FRACs

### What is the objective of a DFIT/MINI-FRAC?

The main purpose is to break down the formation to create a small fracture and observe the pressure respond before and after fracture closure. The short fracture establishes a better communication between the wellbore and true formation.

### How to perform a DFIT/MINI-FRAC with DST string?

### Why DFIT/MINI-FRAC Test?

DFIT/MINI-FRAC tests are conducted to obtain fracture design parameters (fracture closure, fracture gradient, fluid leakoff and fluid efficiency) and reservoir characterization parameters (formation permeability, reservoir pressure, flow regimes, flow capacity).

**Pre-Closure Analysis (PCA)** is used to determine fracture design parameters (flow is governed by the fracture). PCA is performed with injection and time data collected until fracture closure. It uses a G-function derivative analysis to determine fracture closure and fluid leakoff, see Figure 2.

**Figure 1.** Modified DFIT/Mini-frac test overview – Northstar Real Time Recording Data [1].

**After-Closure Analysis (ACA)**is used to estimate reservoir characterization parameters. ACA is performed with pressure data collected after fracture closure (flow is governed by the reservoir) and a similar approach to traditional pressure transient analysis (PTA), see figure 3.

**Figure 2.** Modified Fekete G-function Semilog Plot to Estimate Fracture Design Parameters [2].

**After-Closure Analysis (ACA)**is used to estimate reservoir characterization parameters. ACA is performed with pressure data collected after fracture closure (flow is governed by the reservoir) and a similar approach to traditional pressure transient analysis (PTA), see figure 3.

**Figure 3.** Soliman ACA Derivate Analysis and Conventional Injection/Falloff Derivative Analysis to Estimate Reservoir Pressure and Permeability [3].

### Benefits

- Real-time pressure closure confirmation to estimate formation minimum in-situ stress.
- Estimate critical parameters for fracture design and production/reservoir engineering.
- DH Shut-in Valve to decrease effect of wellbore storage
- Better estimation of reservoir properties in tight-low permeability formations

### References

[1] HIS Markit Ltd. “Minifrac”. WellTest 2019.1. 2021, Minifrac (ihsenergy.ca). *Revised*: *November 9, 2021. *

[2] Fekete Associates Inc. “Mini-frac (DFIT) Analysis for Unconventional Reservoir using F.A.S.T WellTest^{TM}”. Petroleumengineer.ru. Microsoft PowerPoint – Mini-frac Analysis for Unconventional Reservoirs using FAST WellTest_Updated 16-Aug-2013 (petroleumengineers.ru). *Revised: August 16, 2013. *

[3] Ewens, S. Idorenyin, E. O’Donnell, P. Bruneer, F. and Santo, M. “Executing Minifrac Tests and Interpreting After-Closure Data for Determining Reservoir Characteristics in Unconventional Reservoirs”. OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/162779-MS. *Published: October 30, 2012.*

Industry Applications recently used.

Find information on any of our DST services.

Solutions recently used in geothermal

### What is the objective of a MINI-FRAC?

### How to perform a MINI-FRAC with DST string?

### Why MINI-FRAC Test?

**Pre-Closure Analysis (PCA)**is used to determine fracture design parameters (flow is governed by the fracture). PCA is performed with injection and time data collected until fracture closure. It uses a G-function derivative analysis to determine fracture closure and fluid leakoff, see Figure 2.

**Figure 1.** Modified Mini-frac test overview – Northstar Real Time Recording Data [1].

**After-Closure Analysis (ACA)**is used to estimate reservoir characterization parameters. ACA is performed with pressure data collected after fracture closure (flow is governed by the reservoir) and a similar approach to traditional pressure transient analysis (PTA), see figure 3.

**Figure 2.** Modified Fekete G-function Semilog Plot to Estimate Fracture Design Parameters [2].

**After-Closure Analysis (ACA)**is used to estimate reservoir characterization parameters. ACA is performed with pressure data collected after fracture closure (flow is governed by the reservoir) and a similar approach to traditional pressure transient analysis (PTA), see figure 3.

**Figure 3.** Soliman ACA Derivate Analysis and Conventional Injection/Falloff Derivative Analysis to Estimate Reservoir Pressure and Permeability [3].

### Benefits

- Real-time pressure closure confirmation to estimate formation minimum in-situ stress.
- Estimate critical parameters for fracture design and production/reservoir engineering.
- DH Shut-in Valve to decrease effect of wellbore storage
- Better estimation of reservoir properties in tight-low permeability formations

### References

[1] HIS Markit Ltd. “Minifrac”. WellTest 2019.1. 2021, Minifrac (ihsenergy.ca). *Revised*: *November 9, 2021. *

[2] Fekete Associates Inc. “Mini-frac (DFIT) Analysis for Unconventional Reservoir using F.A.S.T WellTest^{TM}”. Petroleumengineer.ru. Microsoft PowerPoint – Mini-frac Analysis for Unconventional Reservoirs using FAST WellTest_Updated 16-Aug-2013 (petroleumengineers.ru). *Revised: August 16, 2013. *

[3] Ewens, S. Idorenyin, E. O’Donnell, P. Bruneer, F. and Santo, M. “Executing Minifrac Tests and Interpreting After-Closure Data for Determining Reservoir Characteristics in Unconventional Reservoirs”. OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/162779-MS. *Published: October 30, 2012.*

### What is the objective of a MINI-FRAC?

### How to perform a MINI-FRAC with DST string?

**Figure 1.** Modified Mini-frac test overview – Northstar Real Time Recording Data [1].

### Why MINI-FRAC Test?

Minifrac test are conducted to obtain fracture design parameters (fracture closure, fracture gradient, fluid leakoff and fluid efficiency) and reservoir characterization parameters (formation permeability, reservoir pressure, flow regimes, flow capacity).

**Pre-Closure Analysis (PCA)** is used to determine fracture design parameters (flow is governed by the fracture). PCA is performed with injection and time data collected until fracture closure. It uses a G-function derivative analysis to determine fracture closure and fluid leakoff, see Figure 2.

**Figure 2.** Modified Fekete G-function Semilog Plot to Estimate Fracture Design Parameters [2].

**After-Closure Analysis (ACA) **is used to estimate reservoir characterization parameters. ACA is performed with pressure data collected after fracture closure (flow is governed by the reservoir) and a similar approach to traditional pressure transient analysis (PTA), see figure 3.

**Figure 3.** Soliman ACA Derivate Analysis and Conventional Injection/Falloff Derivative Analysis to Estimate Reservoir Pressure and Permeability [3].

**After-Closure Analysis (ACA) **is used to estimate reservoir characterization parameters. ACA is performed with pressure data collected after fracture closure (flow is governed by the reservoir) and a similar approach to traditional pressure transient analysis (PTA), see figure 3.

### Benefits

- Real-time pressure closure confirmation to estimate formation minimum in-situ stress.
- Estimate critical parameters for fracture design and production/reservoir engineering.
- DH Shut-in Valve to decrease effect of wellbore storage
- Better estimation of reservoir properties in tight-low permeability formations

### References

[1] HIS Markit Ltd. “Minifrac”. WellTest 2019.1. 2021, Minifrac (ihsenergy.ca). *Revised*: *November 9, 2021. *

[2] Fekete Associates Inc. “Mini-frac (DFIT) Analysis for Unconventional Reservoir using F.A.S.T WellTest^{TM}”. Petroleumengineer.ru. Microsoft PowerPoint – Mini-frac Analysis for Unconventional Reservoirs using FAST WellTest_Updated 16-Aug-2013 (petroleumengineers.ru). *Revised: August 16, 2013. *

[3] Ewens, S. Idorenyin, E. O’Donnell, P. Bruneer, F. and Santo, M. “Executing Minifrac Tests and Interpreting After-Closure Data for Determining Reservoir Characteristics in Unconventional Reservoirs”. OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/162779-MS. *Published: October 30, 2012.*